It's back! The latest episode of Anyone's Game is here for your enjoyment. Apologies this one's a couple of days late, but I hope you enjoy it nonetheless.
This week's topics: the saga of the England manager role, the latest from the Six Nations, a look ahead to the Premier League, the appeal (or lack thereof) of Formula 1 and lots more!
This week's presenter is James Pearson, guests are Matt Tyzack, Jamie Hamilton and Charli Burden and the producer is yours truly.
As ever, any comments or suggestions welcome - just pop them below.
Sunday, 12 February 2012
Anyone's Game Episode 7
Labels:
England,
Fabio Capello,
football,
Formula 1,
France,
Harry Redknapp,
Ireland,
Italy,
Kimmi Raikkonen,
Liverpool,
Manchester United,
Michael Schumacher,
Rafael Benitez,
rugby,
Scotland,
Six Nations,
Wales
Saturday, 4 February 2012
Anyone's Game Sports Podcast
This is something I've been doing for a while, and I thought it was about time I shared it with you all. Every Friday afternoon I get together with a couple of other MA Broadcast Journalism students and talk through the week's sports news. The result is this podcast, Anyone's Game.
Among the topics we're discussing this week are the FA's decision to strip John Terry of the England captaincy, the letdown that was the January transfer window, the impending start of the Six Nations, the England cricket team's inability to play against spin and that epic Australian Open final.
This week's podcast is presented by me with guest panellists Rob Porter and Andrew Binner, and produced by James Pearson. I hope you enjoy it, and as always I want to hear from you so get in touch and let me know your thoughts!
Labels:
Australian Open,
cricket,
England,
football,
Formula 1,
France,
Joe Hart,
John Terry,
Manchester United,
Murray,
rugby,
Scotland,
Six Nations,
tennis,
Wales
Friday, 16 December 2011
Tough ties ahead for England's remaining Champions League contenders
So, the theatre (or pantomime) is over. The draws have been
made, and the last 16 clubs in the Champions League have found out their fate. And
the two remaining English clubs certainly haven’t had it easy.
Chelsea and Arsenal have both landed Italian opposition. Judging
from what managers and media had to say on the subject before the draw, the
consensus seems to be that this is just about the worst possible outcome. Chelsea
will face Napoli, who qualified second in their group at the expense of
Manchester City. The Blues seem to have found some good form in recent weeks, but
question marks remain over their defence.
Napoli, meanwhile, have looked impressive in their maiden
Champions League campaign. They’ll be looking to exploit any defensive lapses
with their pacey attacking play, just as they found out group rivals and fellow
debutants Manchester City. The Italian club’s own defence has looked solid so
far, meaning Chelsea will need to find more creativity if they’re to break them
down. Chelsea’s greater Champions League experience may work to their
advantage, but it would be dangerous to rely on this to see them through what
will be a stern examination.
Lack of experience certainly won’t be a problem for Arsenal’s
opponents. AC Milan have long been a fixture in the later stages of the
competition, and the seven-time champions will be in no mood for an early exit
this time around. Their group form may not have been stellar, with away draws
against both BATE and Plzen. But a 2-2 away draw against Barcelona suggests
there’s plenty more to come from the Italian champions.
Arsenal qualified comfortably from Group F, going through as
group winners with a game to spare, and their domestic form has improved
dramatically after a terrible start. And with Robin van Persie scoring goals
for fun, they certainly present an attacking threat. But injuries have left
them short of full backs, and with van Persie’s injury record there has to be a
nagging doubt about where the goals will come from if he is struck down again.
The San Siro is a hugely intimidating place to play, so a clean sheet at home
will be vital for Arsenal’s chances. It’s certainly a tough ask for what is a
relatively inexperienced squad.
Plenty, then, for Messrs Villas-Boas and Wenger to ponder. Meanwhile,
for fans, there’s the promise of some great European clashes, and a chance for
English football to rebuild its reputation on the toughest stage of all.
Labels:
Arsenal,
Champions League,
Chelsea,
football,
UEFA
Thursday, 20 October 2011
Rugby World Cup Final Weekend Preview
After six weeks, 46 matches and what feels like hundreds of
stupidly early mornings, the Rugby World Cup final is almost here. I say
almost, because before we reach that point there’s the third-place play-off to
turn our attention to. The quality of the rugby may have been up and down, but
the tournament certainly hasn’t been short of drama. And this weekend should be
no different.
First, let’s consider tomorrow’s third-place play-off. There
are a couple of things that mystify me about this fixture. The first is, to be
honest, why we bother having one in the first place. It seems a bit illogical
for club sides to be deprived of their best players for an extra week, and for
those players to put their bodies at risk, for what’s essentially a pretty
meaningless game. The second is why it's being played on a Friday, when half of the fans will be at work and unable to watch. The final thing that confuses me about this particular game is why people are suddenly referring to it as a ‘bronze medal match’
despite the absence of a bronze medal. The only thing that’s really at stake is
that old cliché: pride. But then again, pride can be a powerful thing.
And with nothing else to play for, we can hope that both sides will open up and
play with the freedom and flair they’ve shown they’re capable of.
Both sides, too, will feel they’ve got something to prove.
Wales, of course, will still be hurting after Sam Warburton’s early sending off
during their semi-final against France. That red card ignited a wave of outrage
directed at referee Alain Rolland, much of it unjustified. Whether or not you
think Warburton was unlucky (and for the record, I do), Rolland was acting
within the rules of the game as they currently stand. Whatever the rights and
wrongs of that issue, there’s no doubt that Warburton’s absence will both
strengthen Wales’s desire and weaken their squad. Australia, meanwhile, have so
far disappointed in a tournament where they were expected to shine. Much of the
blame must be laid at the door of their mercurial fly half Quade Cooper. If he
can pull a great performance out of the bag tomorrow, it would bring some sort
of redemption, although it won’t make up for the loss to their closest rivals
the All Blacks. The match should be fast-paced, with expansive attack matched
by heroic defence. Warburton will be a huge loss for Wales, but on form they
should still have enough to overcome the misfiring Wallabies.
On to the main event itself, and on paper it looks a pretty
one-sided affair. The All Blacks have lived up to their favourites tag with some
great performances, showing not just their characteristic skill and directness
but an impressive physical presence. France, on the other hand, may be the
least deserving finalists in a long time. Well, since England in 2007 anyway.
They only scraped through the pool stages thanks to Tonga’s defeat against
Canada. England’s implosion eased their passage through the quarter-finals,
while that red card certainly helped their chances against Wales. Even so, had
more of those Welsh kicks found their target Les Bleus would be facing a different
southern hemisphere side this weekend. But then again, this is the French we’re
talking about. It’s been said they always have one great performance in them at
every World Cup, and we certainly haven’t seen it yet. Personally, I think this
kind of turnaround is beyond even France. Even without Dan Carter, New Zealand
look set to repeat their triumph of 1987 and maintain their winning record on
home soil.
So there are my predictions for the final weekend of Rugby
World Cup 2011. We’ll find out soon enough if I have any more success than in
the past. This tournament has certainly thrown up plenty of questions, many of
which won’t be resolved for some time. By Monday morning, though, we will at
least know who’ll have the bragging rights in the rugby world for the next four
years.
Labels:
Australia,
France,
New Zealand,
rugby,
Rugby World Cup final,
Wales
Friday, 14 October 2011
Rugby World Cup Semi-Finals Preview
So, the tournament marches on. And unless you’ve been living
under a rock for the last week, you’ll be aware that, contrary to most people’s
predictions (including mine), England aren’t in it. But Wales are still flying
the Home Nations flag, and tomorrow they’ll have a chance to reach their first
ever World Cup final. I’ll admit I was wrong in three out of my four
predictions, but that’s part of what makes rugby so exciting. And hey, you can’t
win them all.
First things first – painful as it might be, let’s start
with England. Their quarter-final display against France was disappointing at
best, shambolic at worst. Even the most blinkered England fan would probably
admit they never looked like matching a rejuvenated French outfit. Les Bleus
have taken a lot of criticism for their performance in the pool stages, much of
it well-deserved. But if there’s anything likely to unite a French side, it’s
the prospect of facing England. They pulled themselves together while England
fell spectacularly to pieces. The inquest’s already well underway, with Martin
Johnson’s job under serious threat. Meanwhile, all France’s previous problems
will be forgotten if they can string a couple of good performances together.
The other northern hemisphere clash may have been broadcast
at silly o’clock, but it was well worth getting up for. Ireland defence coach
Les Kiss predicted a “ding-dong battle”, and he wasn’t wrong. It was a big
physical encounter, but unlike the England game, it was also fast-paced and
expansive. It was a real clash of rugby cultures, with a young Welsh side
taking on an Ireland team full of seasoned operators. Along with the majority,
I thought that Ireland’s experience would triumph over Wales’s exuberance. In
this case, I’m happy to have been proved wrong. Heroic defence combined with
incisive attack saw the Welsh through to their first semi-final since 1987.
They’ll face the French on Saturday, and hopes will be high that they can go
one better.
Now for a quick brain-teaser: how do you win a rugby match
with only 24% possession? No, I don’t know either, but apparently Australia do.
Despite looking second-best for much of the game, they somehow edged a tight
contest. This is all the more remarkable when you consider that Australia’s
backs largely failed to fire. Quade Cooper has a lot to answer for in that
respect. Dubbed New Zealand’s Public Enemy Number One, he probably didn’t have
many fans in Australia either by the end of the game. How he stayed on the
pitch for 80 minutes baffles me. And yet Australia are through, and that’s
thanks in large part to the efforts of the talismanic David Pocock. Yes, some
of the open side’s burgling at the breakdown may have been distinctly suspect.
But let’s not pretend every other back row player isn’t trying to do the same. Knowing
how far you can push the boundaries is a big part of rugby, and Pocock and
Australia just judged it better.
There was result I managed to get right, but I don’t think
many seriously expected Argentina to upset the hosts. I was impressed with the
challenge they presented though, especially given the absence of the hugely
influential Ignacio Fernandez Lobbe. The final scoreline makes it look like a
comfortable victory, but the All Blacks had to work hard for it. And they didn’t
come through unscathed. After the much-publicised demise of Dan Carter, New
Zealand found themselves short of another fly-half when Colin Slade limped off with
a groin injury. These things can sometimes be a blessing in disguise, though,
and Slade’s withdrawal provided an opportunity for Aaron Cruden to step in and
make his mark. He took it with aplomb, marshalling his backs and controlling
the game with a calmness that belied his inexperience. More serious is Richie McCaw’s nagging foot
injury, since the All Blacks look dangerously short of back row cover. With
David Pocock in great form, McCaw will have to be at his sharpest when the two
teams meet on Sunday.
So, given my (ahem) sparkling form so far, I’ll have a stab
at predicting the results of the semi-finals. I’ll go with Wales to beat
France, because the Welsh have looked more impressive with every game whereas
France’s notorious inconsistency still plagues them. True, they overcame
England to get here, but that says more about how poor England were than anything
else. Having said that, they might produce the performance of the tournament –
you really never know. In the clash of the southern hemisphere giants, I’d
expect New Zealand to have too much for an Australian side that’s disappointed
so far. A lot will depend on McCaw’s fitness – we all saw what happened when
Springbok Heinrich Brussow had to go off last weekend. But unless the Wallabies
can quickly rediscover their Tri-Nations form, I expect the hosts to make it to
their second final.
As ever, of course, only time and 160 minutes of hard rugby
will tell who makes it through. I’ll be watching all the action, and I hope you
will too. And we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief that, just for a
change, both of the matches are on at a sensible time.
Labels:
Australia,
France,
New Zealand,
rugby,
Rugby World Cup semi-finals,
Wales
Friday, 7 October 2011
Rugby World Cup Quarter-Finals Preview
Whatever else they may have been, the pool stages of Rugby World Cup
2011 certainly haven’t been dull. With the competition about to enter its
knockout phase, it’s an appropriate moment to look back at what we’ve enjoyed,
and indeed endured, so far, and to consider what might be coming next.
Let’s kick off (yes I went there) with the pool stages. First of all, I’d
like to say how refreshing it’s been to see some genuine upsets in this
tournament. One oft-repeated criticism of rugby is that, in the vast majority
of cases, results go according to form, so that the sport continues to be
dominated by the same small group of superpowers to the exclusion of everyone
else. And looking at the list of quarter-finalists this year, you might think
that wasn’t too far wrong. But there’s plenty of evidence that the so-called “second
tier” nations are often more than capable of competing with the big boys. The
final few days of pool matches saw South Africa pushed all the way by Samoa,
before a determined Tongan side overcome a woeful French outfit on Saturday.
The old elite may still be in charge for now, but there’s plenty of evidence
that the rest of the world is catching up fast.
Which brings me to perhaps the most controversial element of this
competition: the scheduling. Eliota Fuimaono-Sapolu’s ill-judged rant aside, many
will feel that the smaller nations have a legitimate gripe against a system
that’s landed many of them with a three-day turnaround while their bigger opponents
get a week off to recover. But on the other hand, I’ve yet to hear anyone come
up with a convincing alternative. Giving everyone a week off would mean the
tournament would drag on interminably, and no-one wants that. In the absence of
an agreed-on solution, this is a debate that looks set to run and run.
But enough about what’s already happened – let’s look ahead to this
weekend’s action. The quarter-finals get underway with a clash of two in-form
teams as Ireland take on Wales. This is a tough one to call. Wales looked
strong coming into the tournament and have built on that promise with some
impressive displays. They’re a youthful team but one that’s playing with impressive
maturity, as personified by their outstanding captain Sam Warburton. Ireland,
meanwhile, lost all four of their warm-up games before coming from nowhere to
stun Australia 15-6. Since then they haven’t looked back, and a comprehensive 36-6
win over Italy last time out showed just how far they’ve come. The battle of
the back rows is going to be key, with Dan Lydiate, Warburton and Toby Faletau
squaring up to Stephen Ferris, Sean O’Brien and Jamie Heaslip. At fly half it’s
youth versus experience, with the impressive Rhys Priestland lining up against
seasoned campaigner Ronan O’Gara. It has all the makings of a Celtic classic. I’m
going with Ireland to win, just because experience often tells in knockout
rugby. But it’ll be close, and expect plenty of fireworks along the way.
At the other end of the spectrum, we find two teams that have really
struggled for form. On the one hand, England’s discipline has caused them plenty
of problems both on and off the field. On the other, France appear to have
imploded in spectacular fashion, epitomised by their 19-14 defeat to Tonga last
week. But then the French team’s weakness can also be their greatest strength:
unpredictability. Never underestimate the potential of the French to unite
around their common hatred of the English. And if everything finally starts to
flow for Les Bleus, then it could spell trouble for Martin Johnson’s men. But
then again, England have World Cup history on their side. In knockout matches,
they’re generally pretty good at beating the French. They’ve also shown in
recent weeks that, it nothing else, they know how to grind out a result.
Discipline will be an important issue, as will goal-kicking (whoever gets
handed the responsibility). England to win for me – just don’t expect it to be
pretty.
Sunday sees the southern hemisphere take centre stage. First up it’s
Australia against South Africa, a match-up that before the tournament would
have had us drooling in anticipation (and probably confidently predicting a win
for the Wallabies). How things change. For me, Australia’s performance so far
has been one of the biggest disappointments of this competition. A young
Wallabies side has been made to look naïve and inexperienced at times, notably
against Ireland where they contributed significantly to their own downfall. True,
they haven’t been helped by injuries, but then what team hasn’t had that problem?
At the moment Australia look like a team searching for direction, and if they want
to play the kind of creative, attacking rugby we saw in the Tri-Nations then
they need to find it soon. Meanwhile, the Springboks came through the Group of
Death fairly unscathed despite being run close by both Wales and Samoa. The
major exception to this, of course, is the loss of the influential Frans Steyn.
The Springboks looked vulnerable against both Wales and Samoa, and in both
cases it was their defence that helped them hold on for the win. There’s a good
reason why they’ve conceded the fewest points of any team ever in the pool
stages. And it’s this that I think will see them through to the semi-finals,
barring a return to pre-tournament brilliance from the men in gold.
And so we come at last to the hosts themselves. The All Blacks go into
Sunday’s game against Argentina still reeling from the loss of playmaker and
talisman Dan Carter. Without him, they still have a formidable group of
players, and to write them off now would be foolish indeed. But people will
look at them now and think that they look just a little bit more beatable. And
that must be what the Pumas are pinning their hopes on. Contepomi and co have
done well to make it this far after their own star fly half Juan Martin
Hernandez was ruled out of the tournament through injury. They’ll certainly
give the All Blacks a physical battle, but it seems unlikely they’ll be able to
compete in the backs. New Zealand have an embarrassment of riches when it comes
to powerful, skilful centres and wingers, not to mention having the luxury of
choosing between Mills Muliaina and Israel Dagg at full back. Argentina will
put in a valiant performance, but I expect it to be pretty comfortable for the
hosts.
But of course, only the next 48 hours will show who’s called it right
and wrong this time around. There’s been plenty of tension, nerves, frustration
and joy so far, and there’s plenty more to come yet. I’ll be watching it all,
and I hope you’ll join me. Time to set the alarm.
Labels:
Argentina,
Australia,
England,
France,
Ireland,
New Zealand,
rugby,
Rugby World Cup quarter-final,
South Africa,
Wales
Thursday, 8 September 2011
Rugby World Cup 2011: the big kickoff beckons
It’s that time again. Four years on from the Springboks’ triumph in
Paris, the eyes of the rugby world are turning to New Zealand, where the
seventh Rugby World Cup kicks off in just over twelve hours’ time.
There has been a lot of talk in the buildup to this tournament. Will
the All Blacks be able to shake off their World Cup jinx and triumph on home
soil for the second time? Will a maturing Australia side have the fire power to
secure a record third win? And how will the Home Nations fare, particularly
given the injuries that have blighted their preparations?
Let’s start with the hosts and perennial favourites. Since their
triumph in the inaugural competition in 1987, the All Blacks have had an
unfortunate reputation for producing great performances everywhere except where
it really counts. But this time, we’re told, it’s going to be different.
Certainly the signs are good. There’s been more consistency in selection than
in the past, and the star turns have kept (relatively) healthy and kept performing.
But therein lies a potential problem – what happens when one of their stars,
say Richie McCaw or Dan Carter, gets injured? In some positions, particularly
the crucial fly half spot, they look dangerously short of cover, with Colin
Slade putting in a less than impressive performance in their Tri-Nations clash
against South Africa. Will this lack of depth in key positions come back to
haunt the hosts as the tournament enters the knockout phase?
If the All Blacks do come unstuck, then Australia are many people’s
favourites to lift the trophy. It’s not hard to see why: a Wallabies side that
always had plenty of flair has developed in the last twelve months into a unit
formidable in both defence and attack. Their forwards can no longer be bullied
into submission, while their backs have been firing on all cylinders thanks in
large part to a seemingly telepathic understanding between their half-backs.
They will have been boosted by their first Tri Nations title in ten years,
sealed with a dramatic 25-20 win over New Zealand. Some will believe the
Wallabies are still too inexperienced and their forwards still too lightweight
to go all the way, but not many would be foolish enough to write them off.
And what of the defending champions? South Africa’s style of play may
not endear them to many people, but there’s no denying that it’s often proved effective.
Most recently it earned them an 18-5 win over New Zealand. While many
(including me) will have found long periods of the match less than enthralling,
there’s no denying the magnitude of their achievement. Questions remain,
though, over the form of the current crop of Springboks. In particular, you
could be forgiven for wondering whether an ageing squad has the stamina to make
it through six weeks of gruelling competition. There’s also the uncertainty
surrounding John Smit, who has retained the captaincy despite potentially
losing his starting place to Bismarck du Plessis. The Springboks will provide
plenty of bruising, full-blooded action, and in Morne Steyn they have someone
who can keep the scoreboard ticking over. No team has ever successfully
defended a world title, though, and it’s still doubtful whether they have
enough dimensions to their play to become the first.
Of the Home Nations, England look best-placed to top their group, although
they’ll have to overcome first Argentina and then neighbours and fierce rivals
Scotland. England have had their fair share of injury problems, with captain
Lewis Moody and wing Mark Cueto missing their opening match. Their run-in has
been patchy too, with a narrow victory over Wales at Twickenham followed by
defeat in Cardiff a week later. They finished on a high, though, with their
first away win over Ireland since 2003. England’s midfield has come in for a
lot of criticism in recent times, much of it justified, but the new centre
pairing of Mike Tindall and Manu Tuilagi looked promising on its first outing.
England have always been strong in the forwards and difficult to break down; the
question is whether they can show the creativity and clinical execution
required to get past the top teams.
Scotland, England’s companions in Pool B, have also had some
encouraging recent results. They may only have had two warm-up games to prepare
for the tournament, but victories over Ireland and Italy will give them a lot
of belief that they can maintain their record of reaching the quarter-finals in
every World Cup. To do so they’ll have to overcome either England or Argentina,
but on recent form that shouldn’t be beyond them. After that, anything could
happen, but they look to lack the attacking firepower to repeat their
semi-final appearance of 1991. Meanwhile Wales have shown they have the
potential to cause anyone problems, but only if all their key players can find
their form at the same time, and if they can find the consistency to navigate
the so-called Group of Death. And Ireland have endured a torrid time of late,
losing all four of their warm-up games and having two thirds of their
first-choice back row sidelined through injury. Some promising signs, then, for
the Home Nations, but few will be predicting a Northern Hemisphere champion in
2011.
So, the pundits, the predictors and the ex-pros have all had their say,
and everyone’s got their opinion on how the tournament’s going to pan out. The
only thing we know for certain is that, at 0930 BST tomorrow, the talking
stops, and the rugby finally begins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)