Anyone's Game Episode 13

This week's pod is the last one for a while, so hopefully we've left you smiling!

James and I take you through all the week's big sports stories, including Stuart Lancaster's appointment as England head coach, all the week's football, England's cricketing woes and a possible financial lifeline for the Bradford Bulls. There's even a special guest appearance from Mr Will Roe!

I hope you enjoy this week's offering - any comments, as always, feel free to leave them below.

Anyone's Game Episode 13

Anyone's Game Episode 12

Anyone's Game returns with all the week's big sporting stories. This week's pod is presented by James Pearson and produced by yours truly. Joining us we have Vincent Carroll and birthday boy Jamie Hamilton. Plenty on the agenda this week, including all the week's football action, the dramatic conclusion to the Six Nations and plenty more besides!

Hope you enjoy it, and as ever any comments are more than welcome - just pop them below. Happy listening!

Episode 12

Anyone's Game Episode 10

Anyone's Game is into double figures! This week's podcast was produced by yours truly, and featured James Pearson, Jonny Williams, Matt Tyzack and Will Roe.

Plenty to discuss this week, including AVB's sacking, this week's European football action, plus the latest on the Six Nations and the Olympics and the race for promotion to the Premier League.

Hope you enjoy it, and as ever, feel free to post any comments below.

Anyone's Game Episode 10

Anyone's Game Episode 8

This week's sports podcast was produced by yours truly and features the vocal talents of James Pearson, Will Roe and Jay Patel.

Topics covered include Arsenal's Champions League meltdown in Milan, England's unlikely revival in one-day cricket, the latest from the Six Nations and that Man U-Liverpool game.

I hope you enjoy it - as ever, any comments or suggestions welcome. Happy listening!

Anyone's Game Episode 8

Anyone's Game Episode 7

It's back! The latest episode of Anyone's Game is here for your enjoyment. Apologies this one's a couple of days late, but I hope you enjoy it nonetheless.

This week's topics: the saga of the England manager role, the latest from the Six Nations, a look ahead to the Premier League, the appeal (or lack thereof) of Formula 1 and lots more!

This week's presenter is James Pearson, guests are Matt Tyzack, Jamie Hamilton and Charli Burden and the producer is yours truly.

As ever, any comments or suggestions welcome - just pop them below.

Anyone's Game Sports Podcast

This is something I've been doing for a while, and I thought it was about time I shared it with you all. Every Friday afternoon I get together with a couple of other MA Broadcast Journalism students and talk through the week's sports news. The result is this podcast, Anyone's Game.

Among the topics we're discussing this week are the FA's decision to strip John Terry of the England captaincy, the letdown that was the January transfer window, the impending start of the Six Nations, the England cricket team's inability to play against spin and that epic Australian Open final.

This week's podcast is presented by me with guest panellists Rob Porter and Andrew Binner, and produced by James Pearson. I hope you enjoy it, and as always I want to hear from you so get in touch and let me know your thoughts!

Anyone's Game Episode 6

Tough ties ahead for England's remaining Champions League contenders

So, the theatre (or pantomime) is over. The draws have been made, and the last 16 clubs in the Champions League have found out their fate. And the two remaining English clubs certainly haven’t had it easy.

Chelsea and Arsenal have both landed Italian opposition. Judging from what managers and media had to say on the subject before the draw, the consensus seems to be that this is just about the worst possible outcome. Chelsea will face Napoli, who qualified second in their group at the expense of Manchester City. The Blues seem to have found some good form in recent weeks, but question marks remain over their defence.

Napoli, meanwhile, have looked impressive in their maiden Champions League campaign. They’ll be looking to exploit any defensive lapses with their pacey attacking play, just as they found out group rivals and fellow debutants Manchester City. The Italian club’s own defence has looked solid so far, meaning Chelsea will need to find more creativity if they’re to break them down. Chelsea’s greater Champions League experience may work to their advantage, but it would be dangerous to rely on this to see them through what will be a stern examination.

Lack of experience certainly won’t be a problem for Arsenal’s opponents. AC Milan have long been a fixture in the later stages of the competition, and the seven-time champions will be in no mood for an early exit this time around. Their group form may not have been stellar, with away draws against both BATE and Plzen. But a 2-2 away draw against Barcelona suggests there’s plenty more to come from the Italian champions.

Arsenal qualified comfortably from Group F, going through as group winners with a game to spare, and their domestic form has improved dramatically after a terrible start. And with Robin van Persie scoring goals for fun, they certainly present an attacking threat. But injuries have left them short of full backs, and with van Persie’s injury record there has to be a nagging doubt about where the goals will come from if he is struck down again. The San Siro is a hugely intimidating place to play, so a clean sheet at home will be vital for Arsenal’s chances. It’s certainly a tough ask for what is a relatively inexperienced squad.

Plenty, then, for Messrs Villas-Boas and Wenger to ponder. Meanwhile, for fans, there’s the promise of some great European clashes, and a chance for English football to rebuild its reputation on the toughest stage of all.

Rugby World Cup Final Weekend Preview

After six weeks, 46 matches and what feels like hundreds of stupidly early mornings, the Rugby World Cup final is almost here. I say almost, because before we reach that point there’s the third-place play-off to turn our attention to. The quality of the rugby may have been up and down, but the tournament certainly hasn’t been short of drama. And this weekend should be no different.

First, let’s consider tomorrow’s third-place play-off. There are a couple of things that mystify me about this fixture. The first is, to be honest, why we bother having one in the first place. It seems a bit illogical for club sides to be deprived of their best players for an extra week, and for those players to put their bodies at risk, for what’s essentially a pretty meaningless game. The second is why it's being played on a Friday, when half of the fans will be at work and unable to watch. The final thing that confuses me about this particular game is why people are suddenly referring to it as a ‘bronze medal match’ despite the absence of a bronze medal. The only thing that’s really at stake is that old cliché: pride. But then again, pride can be a powerful thing. And with nothing else to play for, we can hope that both sides will open up and play with the freedom and flair they’ve shown they’re capable of.

Both sides, too, will feel they’ve got something to prove. Wales, of course, will still be hurting after Sam Warburton’s early sending off during their semi-final against France. That red card ignited a wave of outrage directed at referee Alain Rolland, much of it unjustified. Whether or not you think Warburton was unlucky (and for the record, I do), Rolland was acting within the rules of the game as they currently stand. Whatever the rights and wrongs of that issue, there’s no doubt that Warburton’s absence will both strengthen Wales’s desire and weaken their squad. Australia, meanwhile, have so far disappointed in a tournament where they were expected to shine. Much of the blame must be laid at the door of their mercurial fly half Quade Cooper. If he can pull a great performance out of the bag tomorrow, it would bring some sort of redemption, although it won’t make up for the loss to their closest rivals the All Blacks. The match should be fast-paced, with expansive attack matched by heroic defence. Warburton will be a huge loss for Wales, but on form they should still have enough to overcome the misfiring Wallabies.

On to the main event itself, and on paper it looks a pretty one-sided affair. The All Blacks have lived up to their favourites tag with some great performances, showing not just their characteristic skill and directness but an impressive physical presence. France, on the other hand, may be the least deserving finalists in a long time. Well, since England in 2007 anyway. They only scraped through the pool stages thanks to Tonga’s defeat against Canada. England’s implosion eased their passage through the quarter-finals, while that red card certainly helped their chances against Wales. Even so, had more of those Welsh kicks found their target Les Bleus would be facing a different southern hemisphere side this weekend. But then again, this is the French we’re talking about. It’s been said they always have one great performance in them at every World Cup, and we certainly haven’t seen it yet. Personally, I think this kind of turnaround is beyond even France. Even without Dan Carter, New Zealand look set to repeat their triumph of 1987 and maintain their winning record on home soil.

So there are my predictions for the final weekend of Rugby World Cup 2011. We’ll find out soon enough if I have any more success than in the past. This tournament has certainly thrown up plenty of questions, many of which won’t be resolved for some time. By Monday morning, though, we will at least know who’ll have the bragging rights in the rugby world for the next four years.

Rugby World Cup Semi-Finals Preview

So, the tournament marches on. And unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last week, you’ll be aware that, contrary to most people’s predictions (including mine), England aren’t in it. But Wales are still flying the Home Nations flag, and tomorrow they’ll have a chance to reach their first ever World Cup final. I’ll admit I was wrong in three out of my four predictions, but that’s part of what makes rugby so exciting. And hey, you can’t win them all.

First things first – painful as it might be, let’s start with England. Their quarter-final display against France was disappointing at best, shambolic at worst. Even the most blinkered England fan would probably admit they never looked like matching a rejuvenated French outfit. Les Bleus have taken a lot of criticism for their performance in the pool stages, much of it well-deserved. But if there’s anything likely to unite a French side, it’s the prospect of facing England. They pulled themselves together while England fell spectacularly to pieces. The inquest’s already well underway, with Martin Johnson’s job under serious threat. Meanwhile, all France’s previous problems will be forgotten if they can string a couple of good performances together.

The other northern hemisphere clash may have been broadcast at silly o’clock, but it was well worth getting up for. Ireland defence coach Les Kiss predicted a “ding-dong battle”, and he wasn’t wrong. It was a big physical encounter, but unlike the England game, it was also fast-paced and expansive. It was a real clash of rugby cultures, with a young Welsh side taking on an Ireland team full of seasoned operators. Along with the majority, I thought that Ireland’s experience would triumph over Wales’s exuberance. In this case, I’m happy to have been proved wrong. Heroic defence combined with incisive attack saw the Welsh through to their first semi-final since 1987. They’ll face the French on Saturday, and hopes will be high that they can go one better.

Now for a quick brain-teaser: how do you win a rugby match with only 24% possession? No, I don’t know either, but apparently Australia do. Despite looking second-best for much of the game, they somehow edged a tight contest. This is all the more remarkable when you consider that Australia’s backs largely failed to fire. Quade Cooper has a lot to answer for in that respect. Dubbed New Zealand’s Public Enemy Number One, he probably didn’t have many fans in Australia either by the end of the game. How he stayed on the pitch for 80 minutes baffles me. And yet Australia are through, and that’s thanks in large part to the efforts of the talismanic David Pocock. Yes, some of the open side’s burgling at the breakdown may have been distinctly suspect. But let’s not pretend every other back row player isn’t trying to do the same. Knowing how far you can push the boundaries is a big part of rugby, and Pocock and Australia just judged it better.

There was result I managed to get right, but I don’t think many seriously expected Argentina to upset the hosts. I was impressed with the challenge they presented though, especially given the absence of the hugely influential Ignacio Fernandez Lobbe. The final scoreline makes it look like a comfortable victory, but the All Blacks had to work hard for it. And they didn’t come through unscathed. After the much-publicised demise of Dan Carter, New Zealand found themselves short of another fly-half when Colin Slade limped off with a groin injury. These things can sometimes be a blessing in disguise, though, and Slade’s withdrawal provided an opportunity for Aaron Cruden to step in and make his mark. He took it with aplomb, marshalling his backs and controlling the game with a calmness that belied his inexperience.  More serious is Richie McCaw’s nagging foot injury, since the All Blacks look dangerously short of back row cover. With David Pocock in great form, McCaw will have to be at his sharpest when the two teams meet on Sunday.

So, given my (ahem) sparkling form so far, I’ll have a stab at predicting the results of the semi-finals. I’ll go with Wales to beat France, because the Welsh have looked more impressive with every game whereas France’s notorious inconsistency still plagues them. True, they overcame England to get here, but that says more about how poor England were than anything else. Having said that, they might produce the performance of the tournament – you really never know. In the clash of the southern hemisphere giants, I’d expect New Zealand to have too much for an Australian side that’s disappointed so far. A lot will depend on McCaw’s fitness – we all saw what happened when Springbok Heinrich Brussow had to go off last weekend. But unless the Wallabies can quickly rediscover their Tri-Nations form, I expect the hosts to make it to their second final.

As ever, of course, only time and 160 minutes of hard rugby will tell who makes it through. I’ll be watching all the action, and I hope you will too. And we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief that, just for a change, both of the matches are on at a sensible time.

Rugby World Cup Quarter-Finals Preview

Whatever else they may have been, the pool stages of Rugby World Cup 2011 certainly haven’t been dull. With the competition about to enter its knockout phase, it’s an appropriate moment to look back at what we’ve enjoyed, and indeed endured, so far, and to consider what might be coming next.

Let’s kick off (yes I went there) with the pool stages. First of all, I’d like to say how refreshing it’s been to see some genuine upsets in this tournament. One oft-repeated criticism of rugby is that, in the vast majority of cases, results go according to form, so that the sport continues to be dominated by the same small group of superpowers to the exclusion of everyone else. And looking at the list of quarter-finalists this year, you might think that wasn’t too far wrong. But there’s plenty of evidence that the so-called “second tier” nations are often more than capable of competing with the big boys. The final few days of pool matches saw South Africa pushed all the way by Samoa, before a determined Tongan side overcome a woeful French outfit on Saturday. The old elite may still be in charge for now, but there’s plenty of evidence that the rest of the world is catching up fast.

Which brings me to perhaps the most controversial element of this competition: the scheduling. Eliota Fuimaono-Sapolu’s ill-judged rant aside, many will feel that the smaller nations have a legitimate gripe against a system that’s landed many of them with a three-day turnaround while their bigger opponents get a week off to recover. But on the other hand, I’ve yet to hear anyone come up with a convincing alternative. Giving everyone a week off would mean the tournament would drag on interminably, and no-one wants that. In the absence of an agreed-on solution, this is a debate that looks set to run and run.

But enough about what’s already happened – let’s look ahead to this weekend’s action. The quarter-finals get underway with a clash of two in-form teams as Ireland take on Wales. This is a tough one to call. Wales looked strong coming into the tournament and have built on that promise with some impressive displays. They’re a youthful team but one that’s playing with impressive maturity, as personified by their outstanding captain Sam Warburton. Ireland, meanwhile, lost all four of their warm-up games before coming from nowhere to stun Australia 15-6. Since then they haven’t looked back, and a comprehensive 36-6 win over Italy last time out showed just how far they’ve come. The battle of the back rows is going to be key, with Dan Lydiate, Warburton and Toby Faletau squaring up to Stephen Ferris, Sean O’Brien and Jamie Heaslip. At fly half it’s youth versus experience, with the impressive Rhys Priestland lining up against seasoned campaigner Ronan O’Gara. It has all the makings of a Celtic classic. I’m going with Ireland to win, just because experience often tells in knockout rugby. But it’ll be close, and expect plenty of fireworks along the way.

At the other end of the spectrum, we find two teams that have really struggled for form. On the one hand, England’s discipline has caused them plenty of problems both on and off the field. On the other, France appear to have imploded in spectacular fashion, epitomised by their 19-14 defeat to Tonga last week. But then the French team’s weakness can also be their greatest strength: unpredictability. Never underestimate the potential of the French to unite around their common hatred of the English. And if everything finally starts to flow for Les Bleus, then it could spell trouble for Martin Johnson’s men. But then again, England have World Cup history on their side. In knockout matches, they’re generally pretty good at beating the French. They’ve also shown in recent weeks that, it nothing else, they know how to grind out a result. Discipline will be an important issue, as will goal-kicking (whoever gets handed the responsibility). England to win for me – just don’t expect it to be pretty.

Sunday sees the southern hemisphere take centre stage. First up it’s Australia against South Africa, a match-up that before the tournament would have had us drooling in anticipation (and probably confidently predicting a win for the Wallabies). How things change. For me, Australia’s performance so far has been one of the biggest disappointments of this competition. A young Wallabies side has been made to look naïve and inexperienced at times, notably against Ireland where they contributed significantly to their own downfall. True, they haven’t been helped by injuries, but then what team hasn’t had that problem? At the moment Australia look like a team searching for direction, and if they want to play the kind of creative, attacking rugby we saw in the Tri-Nations then they need to find it soon. Meanwhile, the Springboks came through the Group of Death fairly unscathed despite being run close by both Wales and Samoa. The major exception to this, of course, is the loss of the influential Frans Steyn. The Springboks looked vulnerable against both Wales and Samoa, and in both cases it was their defence that helped them hold on for the win. There’s a good reason why they’ve conceded the fewest points of any team ever in the pool stages. And it’s this that I think will see them through to the semi-finals, barring a return to pre-tournament brilliance from the men in gold.

And so we come at last to the hosts themselves. The All Blacks go into Sunday’s game against Argentina still reeling from the loss of playmaker and talisman Dan Carter. Without him, they still have a formidable group of players, and to write them off now would be foolish indeed. But people will look at them now and think that they look just a little bit more beatable. And that must be what the Pumas are pinning their hopes on. Contepomi and co have done well to make it this far after their own star fly half Juan Martin Hernandez was ruled out of the tournament through injury. They’ll certainly give the All Blacks a physical battle, but it seems unlikely they’ll be able to compete in the backs. New Zealand have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to powerful, skilful centres and wingers, not to mention having the luxury of choosing between Mills Muliaina and Israel Dagg at full back. Argentina will put in a valiant performance, but I expect it to be pretty comfortable for the hosts.

But of course, only the next 48 hours will show who’s called it right and wrong this time around. There’s been plenty of tension, nerves, frustration and joy so far, and there’s plenty more to come yet. I’ll be watching it all, and I hope you’ll join me. Time to set the alarm.

Rugby World Cup 2011: the big kickoff beckons

It’s that time again. Four years on from the Springboks’ triumph in Paris, the eyes of the rugby world are turning to New Zealand, where the seventh Rugby World Cup kicks off in just over twelve hours’ time.

There has been a lot of talk in the buildup to this tournament. Will the All Blacks be able to shake off their World Cup jinx and triumph on home soil for the second time? Will a maturing Australia side have the fire power to secure a record third win? And how will the Home Nations fare, particularly given the injuries that have blighted their preparations?

Let’s start with the hosts and perennial favourites. Since their triumph in the inaugural competition in 1987, the All Blacks have had an unfortunate reputation for producing great performances everywhere except where it really counts. But this time, we’re told, it’s going to be different. Certainly the signs are good. There’s been more consistency in selection than in the past, and the star turns have kept (relatively) healthy and kept performing. But therein lies a potential problem – what happens when one of their stars, say Richie McCaw or Dan Carter, gets injured? In some positions, particularly the crucial fly half spot, they look dangerously short of cover, with Colin Slade putting in a less than impressive performance in their Tri-Nations clash against South Africa. Will this lack of depth in key positions come back to haunt the hosts as the tournament enters the knockout phase?

If the All Blacks do come unstuck, then Australia are many people’s favourites to lift the trophy. It’s not hard to see why: a Wallabies side that always had plenty of flair has developed in the last twelve months into a unit formidable in both defence and attack. Their forwards can no longer be bullied into submission, while their backs have been firing on all cylinders thanks in large part to a seemingly telepathic understanding between their half-backs. They will have been boosted by their first Tri Nations title in ten years, sealed with a dramatic 25-20 win over New Zealand. Some will believe the Wallabies are still too inexperienced and their forwards still too lightweight to go all the way, but not many would be foolish enough to write them off.

And what of the defending champions? South Africa’s style of play may not endear them to many people, but there’s no denying that it’s often proved effective. Most recently it earned them an 18-5 win over New Zealand. While many (including me) will have found long periods of the match less than enthralling, there’s no denying the magnitude of their achievement. Questions remain, though, over the form of the current crop of Springboks. In particular, you could be forgiven for wondering whether an ageing squad has the stamina to make it through six weeks of gruelling competition. There’s also the uncertainty surrounding John Smit, who has retained the captaincy despite potentially losing his starting place to Bismarck du Plessis. The Springboks will provide plenty of bruising, full-blooded action, and in Morne Steyn they have someone who can keep the scoreboard ticking over. No team has ever successfully defended a world title, though, and it’s still doubtful whether they have enough dimensions to their play to become the first.

Of the Home Nations, England look best-placed to top their group, although they’ll have to overcome first Argentina and then neighbours and fierce rivals Scotland. England have had their fair share of injury problems, with captain Lewis Moody and wing Mark Cueto missing their opening match. Their run-in has been patchy too, with a narrow victory over Wales at Twickenham followed by defeat in Cardiff a week later. They finished on a high, though, with their first away win over Ireland since 2003. England’s midfield has come in for a lot of criticism in recent times, much of it justified, but the new centre pairing of Mike Tindall and Manu Tuilagi looked promising on its first outing. England have always been strong in the forwards and difficult to break down; the question is whether they can show the creativity and clinical execution required to get past the top teams.

Scotland, England’s companions in Pool B, have also had some encouraging recent results. They may only have had two warm-up games to prepare for the tournament, but victories over Ireland and Italy will give them a lot of belief that they can maintain their record of reaching the quarter-finals in every World Cup. To do so they’ll have to overcome either England or Argentina, but on recent form that shouldn’t be beyond them. After that, anything could happen, but they look to lack the attacking firepower to repeat their semi-final appearance of 1991. Meanwhile Wales have shown they have the potential to cause anyone problems, but only if all their key players can find their form at the same time, and if they can find the consistency to navigate the so-called Group of Death. And Ireland have endured a torrid time of late, losing all four of their warm-up games and having two thirds of their first-choice back row sidelined through injury. Some promising signs, then, for the Home Nations, but few will be predicting a Northern Hemisphere champion in 2011.

So, the pundits, the predictors and the ex-pros have all had their say, and everyone’s got their opinion on how the tournament’s going to pan out. The only thing we know for certain is that, at 0930 BST tomorrow, the talking stops, and the rugby finally begins.

Weekly Sports Update: 17th August

Big kickoff leaves plenty to ponder for season ahead

After all the hysterical headlines during the week, the start of the Premiership season actually went remarkably smoothly, with only Spurs’ match against Everton being postponed. It’s always entertaining to check the Premiership table after the first weekend (any bets on how long Bolton will last at the top?), but the opening fixtures can tell us a lot about how the season’s shaping up.

First, it looks like the newly promoted sides are going to struggle. For QPR and Swansea it was a baptism of fire, with both going down 4-0 and QPR having a man sent off into the bargain. Norwich City bucked the trend, though, managing a 1-1 draw away at Wigan. Last season the struggle for survival was at least as exciting as the race for the title – let’s hope it’s another closely-fought contest, and that at least one of the Premier League’s new boys can make the top flight their permanent home.

Second, the eclipse of London by Manchester continues apace. After United’s triumph in the Community Shield, it was the blue half of the city that was celebrating after they thrashed Swansea on Monday night. Combine that with the Reds producing an assured, if less spectacular, win over West Brom, this should be a rivalry to savour.

The London clubs, meanwhile, have found the start of proceedings considerably tougher. While Spurs’ opener has been put on hold, Chelsea could only manage a draw away at Stoke and Arsenal played out a bad-tempered goalless draw at Newcastle. With the loss of Cesc Fabregas now confirmed and the departure of Samir Nasri rumoured to be imminent, it looks like there are tough times ahead for the Gunners. Combine this with an unconvincing display against Udinese in the first leg of their Champions League qualifier last night and it’s not surprising that some have suggested Arsene Wenger’s position may be under threat.

Finally, it looks like there’ll be a few new household names by the end of this season. In terms of new signings, Manchester City’s Sergio Aguero made an instant impact, announcing his arrival with two goals in a standout individual performance. Meanwhile, Manchester United are setting the early pace in terms of developing young players. The inclusion of Tom Cleverley in the England squad for last week’s cancelled friendly was fully deserved after his efforts in the Community Shield. How easily new players, whether new signings or products of academies, adjust to life in the Premier League will have a major impact on how their teams fare.

So, the Premier League circus has rolled into town once again. Its opening weekend eventually faced far less disruption than had been feared, and as ever it supplied us with plenty of talking points. Of course, it’s too early to say much consequence about the season ahead, but a few general trends are discernible. Above all, it looks set to be a season full of twists, turns and a few surprises. Just what we’d expect from the best and most exciting league in the world.

A backward step for English rugby?

Being an English rugby fan has always been a bit of a rollercoaster. From game to game, the team’s performances can provoke dizzying elation or gut-wrenching despair, with consecutive performances often differing so widely that it’s hard to believe you’re watching the same team.

The experience of watching England slump to a 19-9 defeat against Wales in Cardiff definitely fell into the gut-wrenching despair category. Or perhaps despair is too strong a word: a more accurate description might be frustration. At times in the past year or so, England have shown glimpses of real flair and ambition, and what’s more, of clinical execution. Sadly, those glimpses have been all too rare, and on Saturday they were almost entirely absent. What we got instead was a reminder of why it’s best to clear the area of breakable objects before watching England play, just in case you feel tempted to hurl them at the TV.

Put simply, England were impotent. Their forwards dominated at the set piece but didn’t have the control to finish off the chances they created, while the back line lacked any creative spark. Take nothing away from Wales, who defended manfully and took their chances well, but England looked clueless in attack and, perhaps more worryingly, were also exposed in defence. Afterwards, Martin Johnson admitted there were things to work on, but it will take more than head-scratching and beard-stroking to make England a force in New Zealand.

Which is not to say that it’s impossible. We should consider the mitigating circumstances which, although they cannot excuse, can at least help to account for England’s poor performance in Cardiff. One is the sheer scale of the personnel changes made between the Twickenham match and the return fixture. No fewer than thirteen changes were made to England’s starting line-up, with only Alex Corbisiero and Matt Banahan retaining their places. It’s hard to achieve consistent results when there’s such inconsistency in terms of selection. England have also been hampered by injuries, most recently to Danny Care, although of course they’re far from unusual in this.

Several factors should also help boost England in the days and weeks ahead. One of the most important is the expected recovery of injured trio Andrew Sheridan, Lewis Moody and Ben Youngs, all surely set for a place in the squad. Another is that, as long-suffering England fans are well aware, a week is a long time in rugby. A good performance against Ireland in Dublin next weekend will see England head off to the World Cup full of confidence, with Saturday’s abject display all but forgotten. But then again, another poor display would see many write off their chances before the tournament’s even begun.

That’s perhaps the most frustrating thing about this England side: you just never know. And in a World Cup, inconsistency can be a fatal weakness. We’ll just have to hope the right England team turns up on the day. And hide anything fragile, just in case.

England's cricketers claim top spot

England’s cricketers are literally on top of the world. A totally dominant performance at Edgbaston, where they won by an innings and 242 runs with a  day to spare, confirmed that whatever the outcome of this week’s final Test at the Oval, England are now the world’s number one-ranked Test side.

And now for the question that inevitably follows: do they deserve it? Has this series been a magnificent English display that would have swept any team aside, or the humiliation of an exhausted and demoralised Indian side who had waved the white flag long before this point?

The truth, as always, probably lies somewhere between these two extremes. There’s no question India were poor at times, but England showed a single-mindedness in the pursuit of victory that has often been lacking in previous sides. They also seem to have moved past relying on just one or two star players to get them out of trouble. If one player has an off day, Alistair Cook in the first two Tests against India being a notable example, there are ten others ready to pick up the slack.

One of the key attributes in England’s assault on the number one ranking has been consistency. After all, this is an England team that has been winning Tests for a while now. They haven’t lost a Test series in over two years, during which time they became the first English side since 1987 to win the Ashes in Australia. There’s also been consistency in terms of personnel, with a well-developed coaching setup and an established core group of players helping to build a solid foundation for success. This also means that any player who does go through a lean spell knows that they’ll be given time to play themselves back into form (witness Cook’s outstanding 294 in the third Test against India).

Of course, there’ll always be those who argue that England have simply profited from others’ weaknesses. It’s certainly true that the Australian side that England defeated Down Under were a far cry from the dominant force of the late 1990s, and the India team that rolled over and capitulated in this series struggled for both form and morale. But you can only beat the team that’s put in front of you, and for some time now that’s exactly what England have done.

Which brings me to the second inevitable question: now that England have made it to the top of the rankings, can they stay there? There will certainly be huge challenges ahead. Winning away will always be a struggle, particularly against South Africa, who they only managed to draw with last time around. And as injuries take their toll, the depth of England’s squad is bound to be tested. One thing’s for certain: England may be on top of the world right now, but to prove they’re really world-beaters they’ll have to stay there. And that’s where the true test begins.

Welcome to the new and improved Live Sport, Write Sport!

Welcome to my new, improved and extra shiny blog!

Apologies for the longer than usual absence - as you can see, the blog's been undergoing a bit of a redesign. This is now complete, and there's lots of new content to go with the new look.

If you want to keep up to date with the latest from Live Sport, Write Sport, why not select the 'follow by email' option on this page? That way, you'll get an email to let you know every time I've uploaded something new. Alternatively, you can follow me on Twitter and I'll tweet a link to any new content.

Feel free to explore, and as always, if you've got any comments or suggestions, just let me know. I hope you enjoy your visit and please come again!

Weekly Sports Update 4: 02/08/11 Part 2

This week’s top story has to be England’s win in the second Test against India, so I decided to focus on that for this week’s article. Here I’ll look at the reasons behind England’s victory, some areas of concern for the home side and whether England really have what it takes to become the world’s number one Test team. As ever, feel free to leave any comments or suggestions below, and if you like what you see, why not become a follower?

England took a major step towards replacing India at the top of the world Test rankings with an emphatic win at Trent Bridge. It took just four days for the hosts to wrap up a 319-run victory and take a 2-0 lead in the four-match series.

As clear-cut as this sounds, this was far from being a straightforward victory. England had to be rescued by some individual heroics, notably from Broad and Bresnan, and they were also helped by an Indian side who were poor in several areas. Concerns also remain for the home side, with injuries and a lack of form both having the potential to cause problems. So, essentially, let’s not get carried away and claim this was a perfect performance.

I say that first of all because, to be honest, it’s hard not to get carried away. After all, England have just beaten the world’s top Test side by a huge margin. Yes, there were some major scares along the way. England needed a quick-fire 50 from Stuart Broad to spare their blushes in the first innings. Broad then had to produce some of his best bowling, including a hat-trick, to keep the hosts within touching distance at the halfway stage. But that’s the sign of a great side – when they seem to be struggling, key players are able to lift their game and get things back on track.

It’s this trait that separates the world’s best sides from all the others. And it’s one that England have demonstrated time and again so far in this series. Take the first innings here: England had been reduced to 124-8 at tea on day one before Broad’s 64 helped steer them to a more respectable 221 all out. He then produced a great display with the ball, including five wickets for no runs in sixteen deliveries, to reduce India to 288 all out and keep England in with a chance.

An eventful second innings saw the home side capitalise on that to reach 544, setting India a target of 478 to win. This achievement was even more impressive given the poor form that continued to dog England’s openers, particularly Alistair Cook who made just seven runs in the entire match. Enter Ian Bell, who has struggled when batting at number three in the past, who silenced his critics with a confident and stylish 157. An excellent 90 from Tim Bresnan and some woeful fielding piled on the misery for India, whose bowlers looked to have run out of ideas as England reached a daunting total of 544.

It would be wrong not to pause here and consider the controversy surrounding the dismissal and subsequent recalling of Ian Bell. This one seems to have split the pundits, with some praising Indian captain M. S. Dhoni for upholding the spirit of the game and others criticising his failure to uphold a legitimate appeal. I don’t intend to wade into this debate, other than to express my relief that it didn’t have a significant impact on the outcome of the match. No-one, I would hope, would seriously try to argue that had Bell’s dismissal been upheld, India would have fought back to win the match. It was a confusing and potentially ugly incident, but it was quickly resolved (whatever you think of the decision) and ultimately proved largely irrelevant.

So, on to India’s second innings. The visiting side never looked likely to reach their target, and their hopes of even coming close were dealt a serious blow when Broad removed Rahul Dravid for just six runs. England’s seamers piled on the pressure, and before long V. V. S. Laxman’s middle stump was sent flying by a great delivery from James Anderson. But the day belonged to Tim Bresnan, the Yorkshireman (on Yorkshire day – who knew that existed until yesterday?) taking his first ever Test match five-wicket haul. The one bright spot for India was a half-century from Sachin Tendulkar, but even that brief show of defiance came to an end after a poor leave trapped him lbw from the bowling of Broad. With the great man gone it was simply a question of how long it would take England to wrap things up. Appropriately, it fell to man of the match Broad to do the honours, bowling Sreesanth to leave India on just 158 all out.

There’s no doubt that this was an impressive victory, secured by a team that is staking its claim to be the world’s best. But it was also a sorry defeat for a team that has failed to fire so far in this series. It’s true that India have suffered from injury and illness to key players, but so have England. As I’ve mentioned, it’s how they react in moments of adversity that separates the best from the rest, and India’s response to losing Zaheer Khan, and to poor performances from their leading batsmen, has placed them decidedly in the latter category. It seems highly likely that England will replace India as the world’s top Test team after this series. If that happens, few will deny that they deserve it.

Weekly Sports Update 4: 02/08/11 Part 1

Weekly Sports Update 3: 26/07/11 Part 2

This week I’ve decided to focus on the Diamond League athletics in Monaco, an important meeting in the run-up to the World Championships next month. As well as looking at the meeting itself, I wanted to consider the effect that a spate of injuries to top competitors will have on the level of competition, and whether the profile of the World Championships will be affected by the absence of some of the great rivalries that make athletics so entertaining.

The countdown to the World Championships continued on Friday with an eventful Diamond League meeting in Monaco.

The sporting action was nearly overshadowed by a bizarre incident involving two French athletes. After the men’s 1500m race, France’s Mehdi Baala and Mahiedine Mekhissi-Benabbad came to blows and had to be separated by officials. Both men have since been provisionally suspended.

However, this incident should not be allowed to obscure what was a hugely entertaining evening of athletics. For British fans, there was plenty to cheer about, most notably another excellent performance from Mo Farah. Farah produced a great performance to beat a world-class field and win the 5000m, setting a new British record in the process. Based on recent evidence, Farah’s move to the USA seems to be paying dividends, and he must now be regarded as a strong gold medal contender in Daegu.

The performance of Tiffany Ofili-Porter in the 100m hurdles also provided encouragement. The former American had struggled to find her best form at previous meetings, but she too produced a record-breaking run to finish third behind Australia’s Sally Pearson and American Kellie Wells. Meanwhile, Phillips Idowu shrugged off his ongoing dispute with head of UK Athletics Charles van Commenee to win the triple jump with a leap of 17.36m.

However, Idowu’s victory also signified another prevalent trend ahead of the World Championships. This trend will be of concern to Diamond League organisers, as it has the potential to undermine the basis of the series itself. It can be described as the lack of those big rivalries, those titanic head-to-head battles, that can really ignite a competition. The Diamond League was supposed to provide more of these, but its record so far has been mixed. It’s not the organisers that are responsible, but rather that constant fear that lurks in the mind of every athlete: injury.

It’s because of injuries that we’ve been deprived of some of those great head-to-head contests. This can be seen most clearly in the sport’s highest-profile event, the men’s 100m. Here, an injury to Usain Bolt at the beginning of the season meant the two hardly raced each other, and now a hip injury to Tyson Gay means that they will not meet at the World Championships either. The 100m will still be a hugely exciting event, but there’s no doubt that this is a major blow.

And this isn’t the only event to be affected. The men’s triple jump has been one of the most entertaining events of this season, largely thanks to the absorbing battle between Phillips Idowu and Teddy Tamgho. Tamgho’s season-ending injury is, in one way, good news for British athletics fans, in that it makes a gold medal in Daegu more likely. However, it also deprives Idowu of the chance to prove himself on the world stage against his greatest rival. It also takes a lot of the edge off the competition. It’s hard not to imagine that, had Tamgho been there in Monaco, Idowu would have needed more than the 17.36m he produced to secure victory. Great rivalries force athletes to push themselves to the limit; in their absence things can be a bit too easy.

But it’s not all doom and gloom. Certainly, to claim that the World Championships will be seriously damaged by lack of competition would be to go much too far. For one thing, the absence of a great name can inspire other, lesser-known athletes to produce great performances. Look at the men’s 100m: the headlines will say it was another victory for Usain Bolt, but he was pushed all the way by his countryman Nesta Carter who finished just 0.02s behind him. It would be disrespectful to the athletes to suggest that an event is devalued by the absence of one headline-grabbing competitor. These days, the general skill level is so high that there are plenty of worthy replacements ready to step in if a big name has to pull out.

The problem is that, with the sport aiming to increase its public profile ahead of London 2012, athletics needs all the headlines it can grab. And, unfair as it may be, people simply aren’t as interested in people they haven’t heard of. A World Championships with no Bolt v Gay and no Idowu v Tamgho will be no less significant, and probably no less entertaining. We’ll just have to hope that the viewing public give the athletes a chance to prove that.

Weekly Sports Update 3: 26/07/11 Part 1